Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Innovative Production Systems LLC v. Hoskin & Muir, Inc.
as 2:2021cv11613
Plaintiff:
Innovative Production Systems LLC
Defendant:
Hoskin & Muir, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Great Lakes Central Railroad, Inc.
as 2:2020cv10244
Defendant:
Great Lakes Central Railroad, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Anderson, et al v. EPA of United States of America
as 4:2018cv12725
Plaintiff:
Minor Gregory Timmons, II, Mrs. Mary Blassingame, Mr. Juanell Rice and others
Defendant:
EPA, United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Anderson et al v. Wyant et al
as 2:2017cv13890
Plaintiff:
Ann Kaufeld , Hilda Mathus , Sylvester Obb, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Daniel Wyant , Liane Shekter Smith , Adam Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Admiral Insurance Company v. Conrad et al
as 2:2017cv12176
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tevon Conrad, Trevor Hoskins, Laurence Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. City of Saginaw et al
as 1:2017cv11067
Plaintiff:
Alison Patricia Taylor
Defendant:
City of Saginaw and Tabitha Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hinton v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
James L. Hinton
Defendant:
Clinton, County of , Jay Biggs, Unknown Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Clinton County Michigan et al
as 2:2016cv13982
Plaintiff:
James L. Hinton
Defendant:
Clinton County Michigan , Deputy Jay Biggs, Deputy Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
