Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Stennes v. Summit Mortgage Corporation et al
as 0:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jason K Stennes
Defendant:
Summit Mortgage Corporation , HSBC Bank USA, N.A. , Shapiro & Zielke, L.L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hasan El v. United States Attorney General-Main Office
as 1:2011cv05506
Plaintiff:
Abdul Muqaddim Hasan El
Defendant:
United States Attorney General-Main Office, The Honorable Judge Colleen McMahon-US District Court Judge, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. HSBC Bank USA N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv05303
Plaintiff:
Cyndi Rhodes
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA , HSBC Bank USA N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Secondo
as 11-123
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Michael C. Secondo and Michael Secondo, individually, AKA Michael Charles Secondo
Defendant - Appellant:
Hunter Delivery Systems, Inc., DBA Hunter Delivery Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
