Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cuara R. v. Cayman National Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Cayman National Bank, Scotiabank Cayman Islands, HSBC Bermuda Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Manchinelli Granados, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Juan Carlos Arellano Jimenez v. HSBC BANK USA NA et al
as 1:2020cv22469
Respondent:
HSBC Private Bank, Institucion de Banca Multiple, HSBC North America Holdings and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Gabriel Manchinelli Granados, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Juan Carlos Arellano Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manchinelli Granados, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Juan Carlos Arellano Jimenez v. HSBC BANK USA NA et al
as 1:2020cv22470
Respondent:
HSBC Mexico, S.A., HSBC Private Bank, Institucion de Banca Multiple and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Gabriel Manchinelli Granados, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Juan Carlos Arellano Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zapata v. HSBC Holdings PLC, a United Ki
as 19-3355
Defendant / Appellee:
Grupo Financiero HSBC, SA de CV, HSBC Holdings PLC, a United Kingdom Corporation, Institucion de Banca Grupo Financier HSBC Mexico S.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marlene Norono, Rafael Morales, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rafael Morales Valencia, E. William Zapata and others
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04673
Plaintiff:
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands
Defendant:
Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04400
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Defendant:
Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boston Retirement System v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04294
Defendant:
Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan et al v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv03985
Defendant:
Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero and others
Plaintiff:
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
