Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vasquez et al v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Armando Vasquez and Gisela Vazquez
Defendant:
The United States of America, Carrie Dieker, Oscar Castrejon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
James Isernia v. Danville Regional Medical Center
as 22-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL ISERNIA
Defendant / Appellee:
DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and HSCGP, LLC
Vasquez et al v. Dieker et al
as 2:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Armando Vasquez and Gisela Vazquez
Defendant:
Carrie Dieker, Oscar Castrjon, Dickie Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Isernia v. Danville Regional Medical Center
as 22-271
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL ISERNIA
Respondent:
DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and HSCGP, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Isernia v. Danville Regional Medical Center, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
James Michael Isernia
Defendant:
Danville Regional Medical Center, LLC, HSCGP, LLC and John Doe Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McKague v. HSCGP, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Defendant:
HSCGP, LLC, Life Point CSGP, LLC and Danville Regional Medical Center, LLC doing business as Sovah Health - Danville
Plaintiff:
Deborah McKague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ruelas et al v. Heyward et al
as 2:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Estefania Ruelas and Jaime Vizcarra
Defendant:
Mason Heywood, Dolores Gomez, PHC- Las Cruces, Inc. doing business as Memorial Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
