Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 23-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 23-55336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 22-56074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 22-55748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant / Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, DEP HUD and others
LINARES ALCIBIADE v. TRATE et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
AMPARO LINARES ALCIBIADE
Respondent:
WARDEN TRATE and HUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2021cv07564
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Joseph Biden, DEP HUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2021cv04745
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Proland Management, Mr. Eric Garceti and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2021cv02213
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Proland Management, Mr. Eric Garceti and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Proland Management, City of Los Angeles California, Six Unknown Names Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
