Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Haldex Brake Products Corporation v. Hsu et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Haldex Brake Products Corporation
Defendant:
Hui-Teh Hsu, Roy Lee Lemons and Christina Hsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
LM General Insurance Company v. Yang et al
as 4:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
LM General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hui Mei Yang, 1-2 Doe and Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Douglas v. Hawley et al
as 4:2019cv02354
Defendant:
Rick Stevens, Tyler Asher, Wash. University Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jiang v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2018cv02084
Defendant:
Sec'y DHS Kirstjen Nielsen, District Director David Douglas, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Plaintiff:
Rev. Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang and Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Jiang v. Porter et al
as 4:2018cv01872
Defendant:
Tonya Levette Porter and City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe et al v. Wilson et al
as 3:2017cv05257
Defendant:
Gary Fuqua, Jerry Dodd, Tom Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Rowe and Ray Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Jiang v. Porter et al
as 4:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang
Defendant:
Tonya Levette Porter , Jaimie D. Pitterle , City of St. Louis Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fagan v. Flack et al
as 3:2012cv03374
Plaintiff:
Seth Fagan
Defendant:
Brandon Flack, Richard Hill, Stone County Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Flack et al
as 6:2012cv03286
Plaintiff:
Robin Miller and Brenda Miller
Defendant:
Brandon Flack , Richard Hill , Stone County Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
