Cases 31 - 40 of 90
April in Paris et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2019cv02471
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Charlton H. Bonham
Plaintiff:
Larson Leather Company, LA Duchesse, LTD, Hogwards Carry Goods and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Humane Society of the United States, Center for Biological Diversity and Humane Society International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Pork Producers Council et al v. Ross et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Karen Ross and Sonia Angell
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers Council
Intervenor Defendant:
Farm Sanctuary, Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae:
California Egg Farmers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH and others
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 2:2019cv08569
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Karen Ross, Susan Fanelli and others
Plaintiff:
North American Meat Institute
Intervenor Defendant:
Farm Sanctuary, Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae:
Association of California Egg Farmers and The States of Indiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv05206
Plaintiff:
The Humane Society of the United States, Sierra Club, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Righetti v. The Humane Society of the United States
as 4:2018cv06562
Plaintiff:
Matthew Righetti
Defendant:
The Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Front Range Equine Rescue et al v. Christiansen et al
as 3:2018cv06531
Defendant:
Vicki Christiansen, US Forest Service, Randy Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Front Range Equine Rescue, Cindy Machado, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae:
Modoc County Farm Bureau, Wilson Ranches, Public Lands Council and others
Intervenor Defendant:
The Coalition for the Responsible Management of the Modoc National Forest
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Puppies 'N Love, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 17-17326
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PUPPIES 'N LOVE, FRANK MINEO and VICKI MINEO
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PHOENIX
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Humane Society of The United States et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Humane Society of The United States and The Fund for Animals
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Ryan Zinke and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALASKA, GILBERT HUNTINGTON and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
