Cases 61 - 70 of 87
McCoy v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
Albert McCoy
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee v. Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company et al
as 4:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Larry Winslowe Lee
Defendant:
Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company , Huntington Ingalls Incorporated and Huntington Ingalls Industries , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Huntington Ingalls Industries v. Ricky Eason
as 14-1698
Petitioner:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED, f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/a Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated
Respondent:
RICKY N. EASON and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Evans et al v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Rynell Roberto Evans and Nancy M. Evans
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
