Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Blanco v. The Habit Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2023cv22794
Plaintiff:
Reina Blanco
Defendant:
The Habit Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Just One LLC v. White Mark Universal Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07480
Plaintiff:
Just One LLC
Defendant:
White Mark Universal Inc., Doron Hazut, Sigma Unlimited, Inc. doing business as Eevee and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Blanco v. The Habit Restaurants, LLC
as 0:2023cv61434
Plaintiff:
Reina Blanco
Defendant:
The Habit Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Allen v. Habit Opt Co Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv11312
Plaintiff:
Dempsey William Allen
Defendant:
Habit Opt Co Health Services, Unknown Lab Tech # 1, Unknown Medical Employee # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
August Image, LLC v. Habit Cosmetics, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
August Image, LLC
Defendant:
Habit Cosmetics, LLC and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Boyd et al
as 4:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Jordan Davis
Defendant:
Carol Boyd and Mainstream Habitation Services of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
