Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hagelin v. Caudill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00077
Defendant: Sgt. Caudill and Counselor David Rose
Plaintiff: David Allen Hagelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGELIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-37296
Plaintiff: HAGELIN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
HAGELIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37296
Plaintiff: ADAM K HAGELIN
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06054
Plaintiff: Jaywana Palmer, as Administrator of the Estate of Romello Palmer and Jaywana Palmer
Defendant: Kenneth Moranz, City of Chicago, Mitchell English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagelin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01509
Plaintiff: Karen Hagelin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Petty Jr. v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv08474
Plaintiff: Gregory Petty Jr.
Defendant: Chicago Police Department, Taylor Clark and Emil E Hageline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The DHA Corporation v. Frutarom USA Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03681
Plaintiff: The DHA Corporation
Defendant: Frutarom USA Inc., Frutarom Industries Ltd., Craig Hagelin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Officer Curia, et al
as 1:2015cv04339
Plaintiff: Margo Lewis
Defendant: Jeffrey Curia, Chicago City, Gabriel Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00450
Plaintiff: The DHA Corporation
Defendant: BRC Operating Co, LLC, Frutarom USA Inc., Frutarom Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 4:2015mc10008
Plaintiff: The DHA Corporation
Defendant: BRC Operating Co, LLC and Hagelin & Company
Thirdparty_defendant: Didier Hardy
Movant: Gina Cieri
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?