Cases 1 - 10 of 29
JOWERS v. CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
HAILEY JOWERS
Defendant:
CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC. and RALEIGH GROUP, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
HAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. HAILEY
Defendant:
COUNSELOR MARSHALL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GORRIO v. FRANCIS et al
as 2:2019cv01297
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT PARKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARASELLY, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HAILEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv02171
Defendant:
CAPT. BERGER, P/O CARL ROBINSON, KATHLEEN A. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MAURICE HAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL et al v. HEAPS
as 2:2019cv00714
Plaintiff:
SARITA BROWN MITCHELL and ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant:
HAILEY REBECCA HEAPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novak v. Schneider et al
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
Conor Novak
Defendant:
Ronald Schneider, Regional Logistics Group, LLC, LC Hailey and others
Cross_claimant:
Rapid Response 1, LLC , Rapid Response, Inc. and LC Hailey
Cross_defendant:
Regional Logistics Group, LLC and Ronald Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BOERNER et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05781
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE BOERNER and JOSEPH BOERNER
Defendant:
GREGORY HAILEY and NICOLE WAIBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAILEY v. HAMMONS
as 2:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
LAMONT HAILEY
Defendant:
ROSS HAMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
