Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibbs et al v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Anita Gibbs, Lauren Rhoades, LaQuenza Morgan and others
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi and Chief James E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Benton v. Halcomb
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathan Benton
Defendant:
Dave Halcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lyttle v. Farley et al
as 6:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lewis Lyttle
Defendant:
Rob Farley , Jimmy Halcomb, Jr. , Kevin Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halcomb v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2014cv02796
Plaintiff:
Arlie Halcomb
Defendant:
City of Sacramento , Jay Brown and Paul Fong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Q.B. Associates Ltd. et al v. City of Leadville et al
as 1:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
Q.B. Associates Ltd. and Eddie Halcomb
Defendant:
City of Leadville , Leadville/Lake County Fire Rescue , Lake County Building and Land Use Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gloria Halcomb v. Napodon Woods, et al
as 11-7031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gloria A. Halcomb
Defendant - Appellant:
Napodon Woods, Officer of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Police
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Government
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
