Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Bey v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Todd Bey
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Jonathan Rothchild, Geri Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Emmanuel Benjoassint and others
Defendant:
Mark Walker, Sandra Watson, Ken Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raposo Enterprises Incorporated v. 117 Degrees LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00922
Plaintiff:
Raposo Enterprises Incorporated
Defendant:
Ivy Dawson, Legends of Spring LLC, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00027
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00031
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00029
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00030
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00028
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Hale v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Defendant:
J Martinez, David Shinn, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Kilian Gregoire Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Shinn
as 2:2020cv01388
Petitioner:
Kilian Gregoire Hale and Kilian Hale
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
