Cases 1 - 10 of 63
SINGHA v. CITIZENS BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
EBENEZER MOHAN SINGHA
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, MS. GRACE LORAS, MR. YUAN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
HAM v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
TERESA HAM
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANGLE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
LT. SMITH, LT. FROEHLICH, CO1 GUYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
HAM v. COCA-COLA et al
as 2:2021cv01122
Defendant:
COCA-COLA, JOHN/JANE DOE and ABC COMPANIES
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALOGH ENTERPRISES, LLC v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Plaintiff:
BALOGH ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A HONEY BAKED HAM & CAFE and BALOGH ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as HONEY BAKED HAM & CAFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ham v. The City of Scranton et al
as 3:2018cv01338
Plaintiff:
Linda Ham
Defendant:
Shaemus Lunney, Gabrielle Grudzinski, Corey Manley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv02528
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MO'HAMMED LEE
Defendant:
C. LINK, L. BANTA and NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. (CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE et al
as 2:2015cv05609
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A RIVERA
Defendant:
(CHESTER COUNTY) MUNICIPLE, MARCONI, MATTHEW JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. MOONEY et al
as 4:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
LIONEL S. LAWRENCE, SR.
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Trisha Kelley, Therese Jellen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
