Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Hamilton #941610 v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tony Hamilton #941610
Defendant:
Unknown Watson, Sarah Schroeder and Quentin Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hamilton #941610 v. Bolton et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tony Hamilton #941610
Defendant:
Quentin Bolton, Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Jolly et al
as 2:2024cv10099
Plaintiff:
Nicole Marie Hamilton
Defendant:
Wesley Jolly and Huron Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton #941610 v. Perry et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tony Hamilton #941610
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Lakanen, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. RPT Realty et al
as 2:2023cv12916
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
RPT Realty, Richard L. Federico, Arthur H. Goldberg and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Braggs v. Wright & Filippis, Inc.
as 2:2022cv12908
Plaintiff:
Chiquita Braggs, Craig Mejia, Stacy Cullin and others
Defendant:
Wright & Filippis, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hamilton v. Rice
as 2:2023cv12304
Plaintiff:
Lacino Hamilton
Defendant:
William Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
