Cases 61 - 70 of 681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Boivae Fleming-Martinez v. DCP&P, et al
as 23-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOIVAE FLEMING-MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, VIRGINIA KENNY, Assistant Director, AMANDA HAMMOND, Area Director and others
Defendant:
MRS. JOHNSON, Caseworker and YVETTE RAMOS
MCMANUS v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCMANUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, JACOB E HAMMOND, CHAD L BURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAMMONDS, II v. DEAN
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN HAMMONDS, II
Defendant:
CRYSTAL DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. John Hammond
as 23-1110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN HAMMOND
COULTER v. COULTER et al
as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
JAMES P. COULTER, SUSAN VERO COULTER, KAREN VERO MORROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammond v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01780
Petitioner:
Joel Hammond
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRUMMOND v. HAMMOND et al
as 2:2022cv04294
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DRUMMOND
Defendant:
RAIYEL HAMMOND and J.R. XPRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
