Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00776
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00069
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Johnson
Defendant: Corizon Health Services, Jefferson Dunn, Joseph Wombles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. USA
as 1:2016cv00258
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Heidi Elizabeth Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cuevas v. Hancock Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff: Kristina Cuevas
Defendant: Hancock Bank and Transunion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01711
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hancock Bank v. Syverson et al
as 1:2015mc00003
Plaintiff: Hancock Bank
Defendant: Thomas R. Syverson and Patricia A. Jones
Garnishee: Bryant Bank
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Hancock v. Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00579
Petitioner: Jeffrey Scott Hancock
Respondent: Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson v. City of Opelika, Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff: Michael Davidson
Defendant: City of Opelika, Alabama and Phillip Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock Bank v. Callaway
as 2:2014mc00315
Plaintiff: Hancock Bank
Defendant: Beverly W Callaway
Hancock Bank v. Peavy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00080
Plaintiff: Hancock Bank
Defendant: John R. Peavy and Peavy Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?