Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hancock v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cole Hancock
Defendant:
Erin Williams, Marla Doughman and J Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. HANCOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
GENARO GARCIA
Defendant:
ALLEN HANCOCK, MIKE ELLIS and SHELBY CRICHFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY ROWE
Defendant:
TREY EDWARDS, HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, ZACH NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. HANCOCK COUNTY INDIANA SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv02449
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL FORD
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY INDIANA SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYNARD v. BURKHART et al
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and QUALITY HEALTH CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PATRICK SNYDER
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY BURKHART, BRIDGET FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAYBERRY
Defendant:
SMITH, K. BOWILLA, HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02769
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ARNOLD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROPER v. TRIMBLE et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
TALON L. ROPER
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, S. DECKER, T. LITTLEJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
