Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00444
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Defendant: Lance Miller doing business as Miller Pharamcy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Mendoza v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 21-30571
Not Yet Classified: Douglas Mendoza
Intervenor Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Sree Sai Lakshmi Properties, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00986
Defendant: Travis Rolling Amar, Ramatulasi Cherukuri, Rajendra Kodali and others
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank, Whitney Bank, Hancock Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Hancock Whitney Bank v. AMZ Office Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00565
Defendant: AMZ Office Holdings, LLC, Lisa Marie Nerren and Dike Nerren
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Crane v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant: Hancock Whitney Bank
Plaintiff: Catherine Crane
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Hancock Whitney Bank v. ECS Executive Corp Services et al
as 4:2021cv00932
Defendant: Nasser Edlibi, ECS Executive Corp Services, Rania Edlibi and others
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Knight et al
as 1:2021cv00584
Defendant: CMK Holdings PLLC, Chad Knight and Sara Ashley Knight
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Pullins v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 21-30083
Defendant / Appellee: Hancock Whitney Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nekeia Pullins
Caselas, LLC v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 2:2021cv00015
Plaintiff: Caselas, LLC
Defendant: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Norris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00015
Defendant: Kenneth L Norris doing business as Norris Imaging
Plaintiff: Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?