Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Haneef Jackson-Bey v. FNU Smith, et al
as 24-11247
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKEEL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
FNU SMITH, JOHN/JANE DOE, Pharmaceutical Technician - Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN/JANE DOE, Operations Lieutenant - Individual and Official Capacity and others
Jackson-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
FNU Smith and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
HANEEF SHAKEEL JACKSON-BEY
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson-Bey v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson-Bey v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACKSON-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKEEL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKEEL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACKSON-BEY v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00152
Petitioner:
HANEEF SHAKEEL JACKSON-BEY
Respondent:
T. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson-Bey v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00095
Petitioner:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Respondent:
Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
