Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jones v. Hanks et al
as 2:2019cv00848
Plaintiff:
Elvis Jones Jones and Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
George C Hanks, Jr., Unknown Party, Earl S Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanke v. Halikowski et al
as 2:2018cv02725
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and John Halikowski
Plaintiff:
Dietmar Hanke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2017cv02475
Plaintiff:
Hank J Evans
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crutchfield v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02499
Plaintiff:
Hank Crutchfield
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanke v. Vino Pinot Dining LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01873
Plaintiff:
Brent Hanke
Defendant:
Vino Pinot Dining LLC, Anastasios Tirkas and David Freedman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hanks v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2015cv00149
Petitioner:
Bob L Hanks
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Teresa Godoy and Clarence W Dupnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David et al v. Goliath et al
as 2:2015cv00555
Petitioner:
Sue David, Timmy K Thielmes, Wade Albright and others
Respondent:
Unknown Goliath, Arizona Department of Corrections, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Paragon Vision Sciences Incorporated v. Optical Polymer Research Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Paragon Vision Sciences Incorporated
Defendant:
Optical Polymer Research Incorporated, Hank Stute and Unknown Stute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hanks v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00880
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Margo Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
