Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Hanks v. A-C Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02757
Plaintiff:
Don Hanks
Defendant:
A-C Electric Company, Inc., James V. Weatherington and Gregory W. Gaillard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee et al v. Grainger County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candace McGhee and Chasity Bailey
Defendant:
Grainger County, Tennessee, James Harville, Chris Harville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Doe
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Praetorian Insurance Co. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Hanks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2019cv01011
Respondent:
House Committee of Congress, Charles Kalpatrick, Tennessee, State of and others
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Todd v. Rich et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
Dodds f/n/u, Eric Bryant, Rhonda Staggs and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Shemod Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Lindamoon et al
as 1:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Casey Leon Colbert
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamoon, Michael Neilsen, Tyler Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nan Hanks & Associates, Inc. v. The Original Footwear Company, Inc. (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Nan Hanks & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Original Footwear Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Cunningham v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Eastern Legal Services, Paul Hank, Karl Kepper and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
