Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Hanks et al v. Rueda et al
as 1:2019cv05688
Defendant:
Robert Esparza, James Mendrick, Elgin Autoplex and others
Plaintiff:
Theorthe Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Twaddell et al
as 3:2019cv03173
Defendant:
. Watson, . Goins, . Looker and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Fiene et al
as 1:2019cv04212
Defendant:
Hank Fiene, ABC Parade Float & New Way Signs and Shellee Frazee
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hanks v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Colleen S Hanks
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Vlahakis-Hanks v. Vlahakis et al
as 1:2018cv07607
Respondent:
Elli Manolas and John Vlahakis
Petitioner:
Kelly Vlahakis-Hanks
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
New v. Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03223
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lucy Christopherson, Michael Walden and others
Plaintiff:
Allan New
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuellar et al v. City Of Oak Forest et al
as 1:2018cv05118
Defendant:
Village Of Crestwood, Paul Maletich, Village of Oak Lawn and others
Plaintiff:
Natalia Cuellar, D. C., a minor, Celina Cuellar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv01197
Petitioner:
Jay A Hanks
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03132
Petitioner:
Jay A Hanks
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07635
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Yiyi, Zong Cai Luo and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
