Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Shay et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chaddwic W Shay, christopher L Shay and One Eye Open LLC doing business as Hank's Local
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Payne v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv02313
Plaintiff:
Hank K Payne
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Gibson et al
as 5:2018cv01429
Plaintiff:
David A. Nixon
Defendant:
Hank T. Gibson and Portage County Adult Probation Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hank v. Great Lakes Construction Company et al
as 1:2016cv02104
Plaintiff:
Steven M Hank
Defendant:
Great Lakes Construction Co. and Local 18 International Union of Operating Engineers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Colvin v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23859
Plaintiff:
Hank Colvin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hank v. SKECHERS U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hank
Defendant:
SKECHERS U.S.A., Inc., SKECHERS U.S.A., Inc. II and SKECHERS FITNESS Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway et al v. Jenkins
as 2:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Hank H Holloway , Marsha Holloway , Kelly R Adkins and others
Defendant:
Thomas Jenkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
