Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jackson v. Welborn et al
as 3:2022cv05711
Plaintiff:
Bryce Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Stephen Welborn, Robert Hanks, Bryan Edmiston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanks et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2022cv05359
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanks and Stephanie Hanks
Defendant:
Clark County, Lanny Kipp, Shaun Kays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coombes v. Coombes et al
as 2:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher-David Coombes
Defendant:
Carrie Coombes, Henry Rawson, Victoria Minto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hanks v. City of Shoreline et al
as 2:2021cv00600
Defendant:
Shasta A Willson, Shoreline Police, City of Shoreline and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle D Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks et al v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2021cv00601
Defendant:
Ohana, Dennis B Hoffman, 7 Attorneys Involved and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle D Hanks and Cheri MaKay Wright Oropez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonia v. Rainer et al
as 3:2019cv05979
Plaintiff:
Brett David Sonia, Brett Brooke Sonia and Brooke Lyn Sonia
Defendant:
Daniel Potenza, Does G.D.C.R.C., WDOC, Helen Hanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Hanks et al
as 3:2019cv05382
Defendant:
State of Washington, Clark County, Hanks and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonia v. Rainer et al
as 4:2019cv05059
Plaintiff:
Brett Brooke Sonia
Defendant:
Helen Hanks, Dr E Zeiger, Dr Karie Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafferty v. Liu et al
as 2:2017cv00749
Plaintiff:
Shane Lafferty
Defendant:
Christopher Liu, David Heenan, Hank Fauvelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Israel v. Diamond Parking Service Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00687
Plaintiff:
Hank Israel
Defendant:
Diamond Parking Services Inc and Diamond Parking Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
