Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Mauricio Godoy v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17499
Defendant / Appellee:
JEAN WEISS, MCSP-Md.-ADA-Associate Warden, GENEVIE CANDELARIA, CIM-Education, Supervisor, W. VAUGHN, LL&S, State Official, CDCR and others
Defendant:
UCC-CIM-ICC, INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, J. ANDRES, DDP-Prison Guard Sgt., VINCENT S. CULLEN, Dir. Correct.Ser.-CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy
Smith v. Brangwynne et al
as 3:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Deputy J. Hann, Deputy K. Brangwynne, Deputy A. Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Christopher Nolan v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00967
Defendant:
Does, Chamara Gamhewage, Hannes Rau and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nolan
Hann v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00577
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Donna Hann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Hollander v. Savoini et al
as 3:2017cv01577
Plaintiff:
Lewis E. Hollander, Jr.
Defendant:
Hanne Oleson, Ellen Savoini and James Savoini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Gary S. Hann v. The Canyon Mobile Home Park et al
as 5:2016cv02338
Defendant:
Christian Arbit, Todd Green, Hillsboro Properties, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary S. Hann
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lauzet v. Allen et al
as 3:2016cv00140
Defendant:
Chuck Allen, Decker, Dr. Hann and others
Plaintiff:
Donnivan Lauzet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krebs v. Hann
as 3:2015cv05942
Petitioner:
Richard Edward Krebs
Respondent:
Marilyn Hann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hann v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv01754
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Donna Hann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
