Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Roden #222315 v. Hansen et al
as 2:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Sean Dedric Roden #222315
Defendant:
Robert Hansen, Jeff Woods, Michael LaCrosse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Aper
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Albert Hansen
Defendant:
Unknown Aper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meeks #176401 v. Woods et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meeks #176401
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Pete Hubbard, G. McLead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coonrod #177732 v. Sherman et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
William Coonrod #177732
Defendant:
Unknown Sherman, Unknown Pratt, Unknown Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasstetter et al v. UAW-International et al
as 2:2016cv11412
Plaintiff:
James S. Hansen , Charles B. Glasstetter , Jeffrey S. Baldwin and others
Defendant:
UAW-International , UAW Local 602 , UAW Local 598 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Slaght et al v. Rex Performance Products, LLC f/k/a Michigan Foam and Fabrication et al
as 2:2016cv10159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Slaght , Jeffrey Megie, Jr. and Steven Smith
Defendant:
Rex Performance Products, LLC f/k/a Michigan Foam and Fabrication , Maxwell Morgan, LLC , Don Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams #206039 v. Washington et al
as 2:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Carletus Lashawn Williams #206039
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Lloyd Rapelje, Unknown Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Washington et al
as 2:2015cv13951
Plaintiff:
Carletus Williams
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Lloyd Rapelje, Hill and others
Maddox-El #166273 v. Hansen et al
as 2:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryan Maddox-El #166273
Defendant:
Robert Hansen and Colleen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen #384366 v. Burton
as 1:2014cv00124
Petitioner:
Jeffery John Hansen #384366
Respondent:
DeWayne Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
