Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Singh-Gill v. Garland
as 23-763
Petitioner:
HARBANS SINGH-GILL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 22-1800
Petitioner:
HARBANS SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Harbans Singh
as 21-30267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARBANS SINGH
DTI Logistics, Inc., et al v. USDOT, et al
as 21-71338
Petitioner:
DTI LOGISTICS, INC., LEGEND EXPRESS, INC., FIVE RIVERS TRUCKLINE, INC., AKA Legend Trucking, Inc. and others
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Henry v. Fisher
as 21-20215
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephanie M. Oliver, PA, Zae Y. Zeon, MD, Jamie Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jonathan Brandon Henry, also known as Jonathan BK Henry
MLF3 Atlantic LLC v. Atlantic 111st LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00804
Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corporation, Satya Kauer and others
Plaintiff:
MLF3 Atlantic LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MLF3 Atlantic LLC v. Atlantic 111st LLC et. al.
as 1:2021cv00798
Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corporation, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Plaintiff:
MLF3 Atlantic LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
