Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Harris v. Braddy et al
as 5:2023ct03002
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Doctor Braddy, Wade Walston, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slade v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03404
Plaintiff:
Quashaun Slade
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Correctional Officer Williams and Sergeant Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03335
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Defendant:
Warden Hardee, Mr. Saul, Lead Nurse C. Mad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Hardee
as 5:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Lee Joyner
Respondent:
FNU Hardee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joyner v. Hardee
as 5:2022hc02156
Petitioner:
Nathaniel L. Joyner
Respondent:
Mr. Hardee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. HARDEE
as 1:2022cv00652
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARDEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Hardee
as 5:2022hc02143
Petitioner:
David Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Michael Hardee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03296
Plaintiff:
Leonzo L. White
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03297
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Thomas
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrae v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03295
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCrae, III
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
