Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Howard Kaplan v. MDOC, et al
as 13-1613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD J. KAPLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JEFFREY C. STIEVE, M.D., CMO and others
Smith #202759 v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv01044
Plaintiff:
Frank Egan Smith #202759
Defendant:
Willie Smith, Scott L. Holmes , Haresh B. Pandya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon #186015 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony McClendon #186015
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Jeri-Ann Sherry, Unknown Stieve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2012cv10312
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edwards
Defendant:
Jenkins, Harriet Squires, Stacy Westra and others
Vonlee Titlow v. Corrections Medical Services,, et al
as 11-2535
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VONLEE NICOLE TITLOW
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY NAYLOR, Doctor, CRYSTAL RICE, CRAIG WITHROW and others
Sildack v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv12939
Plaintiff:
Trenton Sildack
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctinal Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton Moffat v. MDOC, et al, et al
as 10-2351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON PAUL MOFFAT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ADAM EDELMAN and others
Maurice Newson v. John Steele, et al
as 10-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE NEWSON
Defendant:
JOHN T. STEELE, Doctor, GARY L. SALISBURY, Officer and HARESH B. PANDYA
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, Director, MDOC, ROBIN GILBERT, MDOC, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, MDOC and others
Moffat v. Michigan Department of Corrections etal.,
as 2:2009cv14696
Plaintiff:
Clifton Moffat
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Adam Edelman and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
