Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Schult et al
as 9:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ellis Walker
Defendant:
Deborah G. Schult, Russell Perdue, David Salamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toolasprashad v. Schult et al
as 9:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Latchmie Narayan Toolasprashad
Defendant:
Deborah G. Schult, David Porter, Anne Mary Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv07370
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Armstrong
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benefield v. Lappin
as 9:2009cv01266
Petitioner:
Lonnie Benefield
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armstrong v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv07370
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Armstrong
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv07370
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Armstrong
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manswell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv04102
Plaintiff:
Curlene Manswell
Defendant:
United States of America, Harley Lappin, Scott D. Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Gordon v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv01129
Petitioner:
Daniel L. Gordon
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milstein et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv07434
Plaintiff:
Moshe Milstein, Moshe Milstein, John J. Okon and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, J.M. Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
