Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 359
Haro-Banuelos v. Garland
as 22-260
Petitioner: SERGIO IVAN HARO-BANUELOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. Barber Shop Acapulco, Corp. dba Peluqueria 5 Estrellas et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff: Gregorio Gonzalez
Defendant: Barber Shop Acapulco, Corp. dba Peluqueria 5 Estrellas, Jaime Haro and Barber Shop Acapulco, Corp doing business as Peluqueria 5 Estrellas
Haro v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as MA/1:21-CV-12024
Plaintiff: Haro
Defendant: Covidien, Inc
Haro v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv12024
Plaintiff: Josefina Haro
Defendant: Covidien, Inc., COVIDIEN, LTD., Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03991
Plaintiff: ROMEL HARO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Priscilla Aguilar et al v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09403
Plaintiff: Priscilla Aguilar, Julian Haro, Juan Madera and others
Defendant: Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Labor Labor: Other
USA v. Sergio Haro
as 21-10358
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: SERGIO ANTONIO HARO
Sam Colby v. Javier Haro et al
as 2:2021cv09017
Plaintiff: Sam Colby doing business as Eden Machinery
Defendant: Javier Haro, Sr, Does 1-20 and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Leprinceton Burks v. Los Angeles Police Department, et al
as 21-56213
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEPRINCETON DEWON BURKS, AKA Dapper P, AKA P, AKA Pete Williams
Defendant / Appellee: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY SCHUMACHER, 33696 Police Officer, in official capacity, MARTIN PINNER, 27242, Detective, in official capacity and others
Haro v. Bryant et al
as 1:2021cv04478
Plaintiff: Ricardo Haro
Defendant: Rodney Bryant and City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?