Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Bell v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Lynesha Square and Haleigh Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Neil et al
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Lonnie Neil, Roderick Malcolm, Curtis Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Alfredo Hinojos Harper
Respondent:
Howard County Sheriff and Sheriff Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
as 4:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Hannah Harper
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustine v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Michele Dauzat, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hair v. Bells et al
as 5:2023cv00144
Defendant:
Becky Bells, Becky Harper, Garza County and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Hair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
James E Barclay, III
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Martin, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 23-30051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Wayne Smith, Angela Harper, Officer Strawn and others
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv05737
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Wayne Smith, Angela Harper, Officer Strawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper, Jr. v. Circuit Court of Washington County
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Elton Harper, Jr.
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Washington County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
