Cases 1 - 10 of 25
NHance, Inc. et al v. Finishline Cabinets, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Chem-Dry, Inc., NHance, Inc. and Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Finishline Cabinets, LLC, Hubsuite Marketing Agency, LLC, David Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Harris Research, Inc. v. Palmieri
as 1:2020cv00733
Defendant:
Gary Palmieri
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Harris Research, Inc. v. Levesque et al
as 1:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Janet Levesque, Chuck Levesque, Kyle Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Harris Research v. Fairbrother et al
as 1:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
David M. Fairbrother and Elizabeth T. Fairbrother
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Harris Research, Inc. v. Greenway Associates et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Greenway Associates and Howard M. Belfer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Harris Research, Inc. v. Zerorez Franchising Systems, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Zerorez Franchising Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Harris Research v. Mr Sandless Franchise
as 1:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
Mr Sandless Franchise
Counter_claimant:
Mr Sandless Franchise
Counter_defendant:
Harris Research
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC v. HARRIS RESEARCH, INC.
as 2:2012cv02240
Plaintiff:
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC
Defendant:
HARRIS RESEARCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Harris Research v. Wood Renewal of Arizona et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Harris Research
Defendant:
Wood Renewal of Arizona and Steven W. Fetters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Harris Research, Inc. v. Jones
as 1:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
