Cases 1 - 10 of 459
Harrison v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Marquez Harrison
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Chang, Ng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Harrison v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv10637
Petitioner:
Michael Harrison
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Roderick Washington v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09406
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Curtis B. Roppe, Shen Jay Fern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Budd v. Harrison et al
as 2:2023cv02313
Plaintiff:
Dante Renee Budd
Defendant:
J. Harrison, S. Martinez and R. Guillermo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Osuji
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Harrison
Defendant:
Johnwilly Osuji
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08175
Plaintiff:
Harrison Blake
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy E. Harrison v. Judge Janine M. Chunge et al
as 2:2023cv05491
Petitioner:
Billy E. Harrison
Respondent:
Judge Lisa M. Chunge and Janine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Fuller et al
as 2:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
David Fuller, Robin Allen, Sally Jo Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Villianua
as 2:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Melvin Harrison and Melvin Demonte Harrison
Defendant:
Villianua and Towsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Villianua
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Melvin Demonte Harrison
Defendant:
Villianua and Towsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
