Cases 11 - 20 of 534
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
PATRICIA THOMPSON, MICHELLE THARP, SUSAN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
NAISHA TISDALE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BROTHERS, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARRISON-EL v. 1 JOHN DOE OFFICER et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
1 JOHN DOE OFFICER, OFFICER TANNER and FALLS TOWNSHIP P.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosado v. Rickard
as 3:2023cv01688
Petitioner:
Harrison Rosado
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRISON v. LIVERPOOL et al
as 2:2023cv03800
Plaintiff:
KEREEN HARRISON
Defendant:
JAMO LIVERPOOL, WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
HARRISON v. ACKER et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PETER C. ACKER and ATTORNEY JAMES REX BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. BURDINE
as 2:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
TIM HARRISON
Defendant:
CARLOTTA BURDINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 2:2023cv03413
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GIULIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
