Cases 61 - 70 of 534
HARRISON v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2020cv01281
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, C R BARD INC, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01200
Plaintiff:
Marshall Harrison
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICE JR. et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03041
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
HARRISON RICE JR. and DEBORAH A. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2020cv00770
Defendant:
Southwestern Regional Police Department, Southwestern Regional Police Board, Stuart Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith and Christine Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Brew Vino, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Steven Chronister, Brew Vino, LLC, Brian Polachek and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Dow and Sandra Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HARRISON v. THE CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2020cv01879
Defendant:
THE CITY OF LANCATER and THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER
Plaintiff:
TYLER S. HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GLOBAL MAINTENANCE, INC. v. AMERICAN ACADEMIC HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
Defendant:
PAHH BELLET MOB, LLC, PAHH BROAD STREET MOB, LLC, PAHH FEINSTEIN MOB, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2019mc00190
Plaintiff:
MIKINA HARRISON and ROBERT HARRISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
