Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harrison v. Chitwood et al
as 5:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
Angela Harrison
Defendant:
W. Todd Chitwood and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saxton v. Harrison et al
as 1:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ray Saxton
Defendant:
Martha Harrison, Sam Phillips, Vicky Kristensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Postmaster General
as 3:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
Anna K. Harrison
Defendant:
Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Harrison v. Skechers, USA Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Harrison
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2011md02308
Plaintiff:
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation, Melissa Kearnely, Richard Kearnely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Livingston v. Everson et al
as 5:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
Henry Beck Livingston
Respondent:
Ronald Everson, Doug Crall, Scott Hass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom et al v. www.isom.org
as 3:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Mary Isom, Yvette Isom, Harrison Isom and others
Defendant:
www.isom.org
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. Harrison Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
Racheal Cody
Defendant:
Harrison Memorial Hospital, Inc. , M. Shane Gainey, M.D. , Melissa Craig, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
