Cases 111 - 120 of 183
Jules v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
Sterling Raheem Jules
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard, Unknown Lege, Margie Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
George Lee Parks, III
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard, Unknown Lege, Margie Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
George Lee Parks, III and Sterling Raheem Jules
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard, Unknown Lege, Margie Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hale v. Harrison Cty Bd of Supervisors, et al
as 15-60168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, UNKNOWN WASHINGTON, Ms. - Legal Assistant - In Official and Individual Capacity, UNKNOWN COULTER and others
Faggard v. Harrison County A. D. C. Medical Staff
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dwayne Faggard
Defendant:
Harrison County A. D. C. Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Harrison County et al
as 1:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Collier
Defendant:
Harrison County and Harrison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrette v. Harrison County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Perrette
Defendant:
Harrison County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Dews
as 2:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
Dremel L Roberts
Defendant:
Mark Dews and Harrison County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McMeans v. McCool et al
as 2:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Bruce McMeans
Defendant:
W T McCool and Harrison County, Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Moran v. Reddix, et al
as 14-60497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD EUGENE MORAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. REDDIX, of Health Assurance and MARCUS THORN, of Harrison County Detention Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
