Cases 1 - 10 of 857
BMO Bank N.A. v. Fina Transport LLC et al
as 6:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Fina Transport LLC and Christopher Fina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCray v. McCray
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stewart P McCray
Defendant:
Harry C McCray, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Harris v. Harris et al
as 4:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Harris
Defendant:
C.O. Unknown Harris, C.O. Unknown Brown, Sam Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 4:2024mc00210
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris, Sr., Welmon Frazer Letzig, Alvin Love and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.,
Not Yet Classified:
Ray-Carroll County Grain Growers, Inc.
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Pete Wright
Defendant:
Lane Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Clarence J. Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pace v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
