Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harry Conner v. USPS, et al
as 16-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER, Designated Beneficiary & Sole Heir of Mary Conner Nelson (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Office of Worker's Compensation Program, METLIFE, INC. and others
Harry Conner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 16-6167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al.
Moore v. Sumter County Court House in Common Pleas et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Darious Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sumter County Court House in Common Pleas, Howard P King, Joseph Spigner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Conner v. Metropolitan Life Ins Co, et al
as 16-5504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE INC., JOHN DOE, Program Manager, Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance, Individual Capacity and others
Conner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Browne v. Conner
as 2:2015cv01868
Plaintiff:
Elaine Browne
Defendant:
Harry Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Harry Conner v. USPS, et al
as 14-5399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY CONNER, Designated Beneficiary & Sole Heir of Mary Conner Nelson (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Office of Worder's Compensation Program, METLIFE, Inc. and others
Conner v. The United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2011cv02476
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service and The United States Department of Labor's Office of Worker's Compensation Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
