Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Hart v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv10690
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hart
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gould et al v. O'Leary et al
as 1:2016cv10181
Defendant:
O'Leary, Daniel C. O'Leary, David A. Provencher and others
Plaintiff:
Gould, Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., Michael Gould and others
Intervenor Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv30192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belanger et al v. BNY Mellon Asset Management LLC et al
as 1:2015cv10198
Plaintiff:
Lisa Siegel Belanger and Devora C Kaiser
Defendant:
BNY Mellon Asset Management LLC, Brian Nagle, Burns & Levinson LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Davenport et al v. Hart
as 1:2014cv13261
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Davenport and John R. Durrance
Defendant:
James H. Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Amherst College et al
as 3:2014cv30114
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Amherst College , Suzanne Coffey , Allen Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Hart et al v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 1:2013cv11492
Plaintiff:
Mary Hart and Gerald Hart
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hart v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv10947
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hart
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hart v. First American Title Insurance Co et al
as 1:2013cv10154
Plaintiff:
James Hart
Defendant:
First American Title Insurance Co, Parker S. Kennedy, Dennis J. Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
