Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Kerr v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
John Kerr
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., H&H Brothers LLC, Aslam Yusupov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KERR v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
JOHN KERR
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., H&H Brothers LLC, Aslam Yusupov and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Payne v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Payne
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BADDICK et al
as 2:2022cv02973
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Defendant:
PETER JOHN BRADDOCK, III, P. SAIKIA BORA, CHRISTINA HAUSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Hauser et al
as 4:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
C. Hauser, Yarisa Polanco, Marissa Redick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Hauser et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
Christina Hauser, Jane Doe #1, Capt. Dreher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHOEMAKER v. HAUSER et al
as 2:2021cv01649
Petitioner:
JERRY LYNN SHOEMAKER
Respondent:
MORRIS HAUSER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CICCOTELLI v. SOLITON, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02843
Defendant:
WALTER V KLEMP, NIQUETTE HUNT, BRAD HAUSER and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CARTER v. LEONARD et al
as 3:2020cv00070
Respondent:
AMY HAUSER/RUCKINGER, PATRICK LEONARD, ATTORNEY SCOTT N. PLETCHER and others
Petitioner:
GENE DONTA CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAUSER v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02592
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", "JANE DOE", MERCK & CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BUNNY HAUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
