Cases 1 - 10 of 37
LoRusso v. Hawley
as 4:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Josh Hawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
1520 Swift LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
1520 Swift LLC
Defendant:
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lindstedt et al v. Granby, Missouri, City of et al
as 3:2021cv05029
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff's Department, Granby, Missouri, City of, Allieger-Martin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri and Pastor Martin Lindstedt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bockelman v. Hawley et al
as 4:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
John Frank Bockelman
Defendant:
Charles Ellis Schumer, Josh David Hawley and Patrick Joseph Leahy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. City of Richmond Heights, Missouri
as 4:2020cv01587
Plaintiff:
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Richmond Heights, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathan v. Lewis et al
as 4:2019cv02472
Petitioner:
Ledale Nathan
Respondent:
Joshua D. Hawley, Jason Lewis and Eric Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas v. Hawley et al
as 4:2019cv02354
Defendant:
Rick Stevens, Tyler Asher, Wash. University Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wright v. Hawley et al
as 6:2018cv03367
Defendant:
Josh Hawley, Jeff Norman and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff:
Sean T Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Wade et al
as 2:2018cv04222
Defendant:
Christopher Hessenflow, Peterson, Billy D. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sherron Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company et al
as 4:2018cv00753
Defendant:
K.M. -T.E.H. Realty 4, LLC, Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and K.M.-T.E.H. Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kendra Roberts, Heather Roberts and Jacob Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
