Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Salazar v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Hayden Salazar
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, Sergeant Abby Yarbrough, Correctional Officer Dylan Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 4:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Domeneque D Taylor
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Evans Motors Inc, Hood & Stacy PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hayden v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Honey Hayden
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Hill v. Cox et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Brent Cox, Robert Case, Alicia Houble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rowland et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Falicia Rowland, Robert Case, Brent Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Greene County et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Parris Hill
Defendant:
Greene County, Greene County Detention Center, Morgan Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. McCloskey et al
as 2:2020cv02093
Defendant:
Taylor Crane & Rigging, Inc. and Robert McCloskey
Plaintiff:
James Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. Carpenter et al
as 6:2017cv06079
Plaintiff:
Fahren Hayden Parker
Defendant:
Carpenter and Erin Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Fahren Hayden Parker
Defendant:
Carpentar, Parker and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv02093
Plaintiff:
James Terry Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenny Smith , Greg Donaldson , Ryan Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
