Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
HAYDEN v. BOLT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01912
Defendant: M. BOLT, D. BUCKMASTER, TRINA RANDALL and others
Plaintiff: DAVID WAYNE HAYDEN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYDEN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv01913
Defendant: KEITH BUTTS, D. DEWENGER, TRINA RANDALL and others
Plaintiff: DAVID W. HAYDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarnutowski v. Bradford
as 2:2014cv00301
Plaintiff: Hayden A Jarnutowski
Defendant: Paul D Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERKINS v. OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01109
Defendant: MELLISSA HAYDEN-KRAMER, AMY M. JONES and OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
Plaintiff: STACY K. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAYDEN v. GREENSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS CORPORATION
as 1:2013cv01064
Defendant: GREENSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, TOM HUNTER, DAN MANUS and others
Plaintiff: PATRICK HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAYDEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv00967
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JOHN HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAYDEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv00968
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JOHN HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAYDEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv00447
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JOHN HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYDEN v. BUTTS
as 1:2013cv00449
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JOHN HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TINDALL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00889
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: SUSAN HAYDEN TINDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?