Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Gaiter v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Felix Xavier Rasul Gaiter
Defendant:
Hayden Marshall and Adam Neely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Church et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church, Bill Church, Ku Klux Klan and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Directors, Past and Present of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Van Over v. AKHLAGHI et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Barry Van Over
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AKHLAGHI, PAMCHAL SAYYAD, NEXTGEN MMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Parker et al (TV2)
as 1:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
John P Parker and Victor T. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McGaw et al v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Samuel M McGaw, Jr. and Leslie Tolx
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee , Michael Fox , Bradley Mount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Sexton
as 1:2014cv00336
Petitioner:
Christopher Hayden Martin
Respondent:
David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Whaley et al
as 3:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Jones
Defendant:
Hayden Whaley, Don Parton and First Med Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paul E Hayden and Paul E Hayden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
