Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bradley, Sr. v. Maryland Child Support
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Haywood D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Maryland Child Support
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. Haywood et al
as 8:2020cv03460
Defendant:
Willie Haywood and Rose Haywood
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5314
Curtis v. DPSCS
as 8:2020cv01903
Plaintiff:
Antwan Haywood Curtis
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Curtis v. Krishnaswamy et al
as 8:2019cv02682
Plaintiff:
Antwan Haywood Curtis
Defendant:
Bon Secours Hospital and Dr. Ashok Krishnaswamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Haywood v. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv01671
Plaintiff:
Michelle Haywood
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haywood-Hovington v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03043
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Mae Haywood-Hovington
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haywood et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02886
Plaintiff:
Leonard Haywood and Janet Haywood
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haywood v. USA et al
as 8:2008cv02583
Plaintiff:
Perry Haywood
Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
United States of America
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
