Cases 41 - 50 of 146
Lindsay et al v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Head Warden Damon Andrews, Former Head Warden Felipe Gonzalez and Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Lindsay and Michael Joseph Bien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wright et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Sylvia Valdez, E. Guerra, Tanya Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRION v. SMITH et al
as 5:2020cv00126
Defendant:
DOCTOR WOODARD, STEVENSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D BARRION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YASHARA'L v. HUNT
as 5:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
MOWRIYAH ABIYAH YASHARA'L
Defendant:
HEAD WARDEN ELAYN HUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WARD et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MYRON TAYLOR, II
Defendant:
Head Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS, Head Warden REAGAN BLACK, Commissioner TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal v. Head Warden of Polunsky Unit et al
as 4:2019cv03409
Defendant:
Major Vincent and Head Warden of Polunsky Unit
Plaintiff:
Courtney Royal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Head Warden et al
as 4:2019cv02412
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales, Head Warden and Assistant Warden
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. C Moore et al
as 4:2019cv02358
Defendant:
Ms C Moore, M Thompson, G Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Mathew Davis and Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Esparza et al
as 4:2019cv02370
Defendant:
A Gracia, Head Warden P.S., Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Mathew Davis and Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
