Cases 21 - 30 of 181
Maione v. Zucker
as 22-782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Defendant:
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Office of Administrative Hearings, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Kirsten M. Proud, Former Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Not Classified By Court:
Department of Justice
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 22-597
Petitioner:
John T. Pickering-George
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration, ALJ, SSA, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review Hearing Office, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and others
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Mitchell v. Cuomo
as 21-2978
Plaintiff:
Ismael G. Reyes, AKA Ishmael Reyes and Gyvon Roberts
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dontie S. Mitchell and Dontie S Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, Patrick D. Reardon, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility, C.O. John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor, SORC Colbert, C.O Brown and others
Morrow v. Bauersfeld
as 21-2928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neb Morrow, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Bauersfeld, Commissioner's Hearing Officer (CHO), Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Sergeant Van Fleet, Superintendent of D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility and J. Perkins, Corrections Officer in D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility
Heyliger v. Cymbrak
as 21-2825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Cymbrak, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA A. Cymbrak, Christopher Lagree, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA C. Lagree, Kyle Guynup, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA Kile Guynup and others
Defendant:
A. Mussen, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Kevin Wilcox, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA K. Wilcox, Liam Mahoney, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA L. Maloney and others
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration et al
as 1:2021cv09251
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration, ALJ, SSA, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review Hearing Office, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Annucci
as 21-2721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lavogia Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of DOCCS, Donald Venetozzi, Director of Special Housing Unit, DOCCS, Michael Royce, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility and others
Hodges v. Lorenzo et al
as 9:2021cv01166
Plaintiff:
Antoine Hodges
Defendant:
Sgt. P. Lorenzo, Deputy Richardson, Deputy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Annucci
as 21-2017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shannon V. Campbell
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of DOCCS, Mr. Ranier, Tier III Hearing Officer and D. Venettozzi, Director of Special Housing, In their individual and Official Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
